The following text (verbatim) was the third statment I submitted as a proposed advocacy ad that was rejected for publication by the NY Times:
The following is a statement written by and paid for by someone who has been making the claim for the past year and a half to being the present incarnation of the son of God. I have a few questions that I would like to pose to the so-called moral majority, the family values crowd: If the Almighty Creator of this world is vehemently opposed to the idea of men having and expressing feelings of tenderness, love and affection for one another, then why didn't he make this one of his commandments to his people? There is no such commandment from Him as "Thou shall not love they neighbor."
Are you sure you are not confused? Haven't the Creator and his son encouraged human beings to love one another, rather than encouraging us to be ruled by an aversion to Love? Are you sure your "family values" are not a product of your own aversion to love? Are you sure the idea of limiting ourselves to loving just one single person is really the best way for human beings to live, in spite of all the evidence that human beings do not do well with this limitation? Are you sure this is not just a mechanism for avoiding addressing the problem of shame, identified so clearly in the first book and chapter of your own scriptures as being the very hallmark of the fall from Paradise? Are you sure that men loving one another is such a bad idea, when it is so obvious that men failing to love one another is the reason for all of this world's problems, bar none? Do you fail to see how much happier, healthier and peaceful this world would be if men loved one another rather than trying to out-compete and dominate one another?
Do you follow a "free-market" sect of Christianity, one that panders to people by giving them the religion that they prefer rather than adhering to truths that may not sell well in the marketplace of religions? Why have you gravitated to a sect that does not confront shame but rather reinforces it by promoting homophobia? I urge you to consider whether you have made yourself vulnerable to an extremely upsetting wake up call in the very near future, when humanity is presented with an imperative to give up shame and the son of god is revealed to be an entirely different sort of person than the one you have in mind when you talk about your personal lord and savior, who is really just a figment of your imagination bearing no resemblance whatsoever to the real thing, who, if he showed up in your town and began speaking the truth, would quite likely be lynched.
Where is the commandment requiring the human race to arrange itself in the taboo-reinforcing nuclear families that you are so determined to preserve against the onslaught of people exercising their God-given liberty to pursue happiness as they choose? Likewise, if incest is the no-no that the whole world seems to believe that it is, given that pretty much everyone respects the taboo against it, why didn't the Creator give a commandment such as "Thou shall not express feelings of love and affection for those whom it is most natural to have feelings of love and affection for, namely, members of one's own family?"
The Master of the Universe did give a commandment not to commit adultery, one that is broken by a majority of people during their lives, but He doesn't make a commandment forbidding consensual relations between two unmarried people; so where does the phrase "living in sin" come from? Since adultery is the only sin related to sexual behavior that is mentioned in the Ten Commandments, and since most marriages are subjected to adultery and or divorce, couldn't it logically be considered less sinful to "live in sin" than to be married?
Those of you who believe that the Bible is to be taken literally, what do you make of the unambiguous verse that says everyone in Heaven marries the Christ? Is that the one thing that you do not take literally? You homophobic Christians don't seem to be preparing yourselves to be a lover of the son of god? And with one another; after all this is a group marriage, right? What kind of marriage do you think this is going to be, one devoid of love and affection? Do you have some goofy idea that there is no sex in Heaven? If you do, are you sure you do not think this because you actually don't really like sex and are hoping you can avoid it by being in something called Heaven (that actually sounds more like Hell to me)?
If the Creator were opposed to human beings growing or using cannabis - which appears so obviously to be the product of a symbiotic relationship with humanity given its adaptation to virtually every environment in which human beings live and the myriad ways in which it has made itself by far the most useful and beneficial plant on Earth - then why did He not command the human race, "Thou shall eradicate from my creation the cannabis that I created and placed in my creation, seemingly for your great benefit, but really I just put it there to give you something to fear and hate?" Likewise, regarding psilocybin mushrooms, the Almighty God seems to have forgotten to command his people, "You may eat all manner of plants, except that thou shall not eat the blue-tinged mushrooms that I invented and that proliferate in the pastures where you graze your cattle and sheep, and that would induce in you ecstatic religious experiences and visions, like the visions that the biblical shepherds had, and that would help you know me in a very personal and intimate way, if I was willing to allow you to eat them, which I refuse to allow you to do for no good reason whatsoever, other than depriving you of some of life's greatest joys."
I also have a couple of question for any readers who subscribe to Judaism: If the Bible Code that has been discovered embedded within the Torah itself were found to affirm beyond a reasonable doubt that Jesus of Nazareth was indeed an incarnation of the Messiah of the Jews, would you abandon your religion and adopt Christianity? What if the Code contained within the Torah made clear that as far as the Almighty Creator is concerned, Judaism became a dead religion upon the crucifixion of his son, which occurred at the behest of Jews living in Jerusalem at the time who elected to free the murderer Barabas and execute Jesus, who had never harmed anyone in his life, just because he was speaking a truth that they did not want to hear? Would you then abandon Judaism in favor of Christianity? Or would you cling to your religion in spite of the authority obviously evident in the Bible Code suggesting that Creator has long since moved on from considering the Jews to be his chosen people or either Jerusalem or Israel to be any more special than any other place on Earth?
A question for both Jews and Christians: The Bible Code has recently been revealed, on a History Channel documentary that aired on March 2, 2005, to indicate that the world ends in a nuclear holocaust in 2012. This was, to the best of my knowledge, the first time in history that the public has been made aware of a Bible Code reference to an event that had not yet occurred. This program appeared on the very day that I went to press with a statement stating that I believed the world ends in 2012 and that the Bible Code would soon be found corroborate some of the things I have been saying. The Bible itself indicates that there is a seven year period of events known collectively as "the end times." Therefore, 2005 is the year that these events should commence. (Given these facts, it would appear that the tsunami of last December was a foreshadowing of things to come.) It would also appear from scripture that 2005 should also be the year that the son of God, the Messiah, the second coming of the Christ, should be appearing on the scene. How willing are you to open your minds and hearts to the son of God? Are you willing to accept him only on limited terms such as that he upholds the basic hallmarks of the mortal human condition such as homophobia, the nuclear family, and the incest taboo? Or would you be willing to accept him as your savior even if he insisted that you take off the fig leaf of Adam and Eve and get over your attachment to ignorance and shame?
What if it was revealed that the son of God is indeed alive in the world today, and that He has been taking out numerous full-page newspaper ads in his hometown defining "the Jews" as being, as of now, an immortal tribe of exactly 144,000 people, currently incarnated as people of many races and religions, who wish to live as one family with only one mother and one father, not subject to the incest taboo or homophobia, and that in order to accept the blessing of eternal life in Heaven you must be willing to give up shame and the manifestations of shame, the nuclear family, homophobia and the incest taboo?
There is such a person. He is the author of this ad. He lives in Seattle, which he has defined as the current location of the archetypal city of Jerusalem, being a progressive and educated city located in a strip of fertile land on the far western coastline of the largest continent in the new world, a geographical description that is identical to a description of Jerusalem, Israel in the old world. A new Jerusalem in the new world with a person who has bought about thirty pages of advertising space in two weekly newspapers in Seattle describing his experience and his understanding of the nature of reality and the human condition, and claiming to be the son of God. He has received scant attention or recognition, having been involuntarily locked up for three days in a mental hospital as a sort of modern day reenactment of the crucifixion and three day descent down into the realm of the dead. An unbelievable number of coincidences in my life, as well as my experience, convince me beyond any shadow of a doubt that what I have proclaimed is the truth. Besides circumstances, there is also a very profound and wonderful experience of having attained a spiritual union with the living God who is Love.
I have named the persons who I believe are the living incarnations of the other two members of the "Holy Trinity" as Neil Young, the rock and roll superstar, and Prem Rawat, a man who is widely recognized as a fully enlightened spiritual master and who was regarded by many people at the age of eight to be an incarnation of the Creator of this world and who as a child proclaimed that he swore "on a stack of bibles" that he would "establish peace on Earth in this lifetime." I have speculated that Neil Young is the present incarnation of the author of the Bible Code. Prem Rawat refers to an experience called the realization of Knowledge that I believe I attained in the past few days that is, by definition, the highest form of spiritual enlightenment.
I have referred to the story Charlie and the Chocolate Factory as one of many important allegories pertaining to this experience, 2001: A Space Odyssey, The Wizard of Oz, The Lord of the Rings, One Flew Over the Cookoo's Nest, The Glass Bead Game being among the others, the Charlie story describing the succession of perfect spiritual masters who are in charge of the collective Mind or Imagination (Chocolate Factory) in which everything exists.
I have stated my expectation that sometime this year Neil Young and Prem Rawat, along with the Roman Catholic Church, will corroborate my statements. I have also stated that I believe I know the identity of the Black Pope, a member of the pro-incest ruling family, who has been orchestrating history, through secret societies such as the Jesuits, Freemasonry, and the Order of Skull and Bones in particular, from behind the scenes, quite possibly since the time of the Roman Empire, leading everything very deliberately to this moment of truth.
The experience I've been having has convinced me that the people of this world are no more receptive to the appearance of truth or of the son of God than the people of Jerusalem were back in the day when they demanded the crucifixion of Jesus. In other words, the people in the world today have no more appetite for Truth than they did then; people are much more comfortable with utterances that are based in ignorance and that allow them to remain asleep than they are with those that are based in truth and demand an awakening. People can and do listen like sponges to lies and ignorance all day long, but when they are confronted with truth they recoil from it and accuse the speaker of truth of being a threat to the community.
My website is Isaacsword.com. There are hundreds of pages of writings posted there which amount to a play by play account of the process of awakening that I have been undergoing for the past two years. I have been describing myself as a sort of psychedelic or shamanic Christ, who's awakening and healing have been made possible through the use of cannabis and two different kinds of mushrooms, psilocybin and amanita muscaria. I have been saying things such as that Terence McKenna, the leading authority on and advocate of the psychedelic experience, as well as being the most all around intelligent person to walk the face of this Earth in recent times, was the reincarnation of John the Baptist, and that, as far as attaining immortality is concerned, baptism is a psychedelic initiation that involves discovering and quenching a profound thirst that is related to unconsciousness, water itself being the medium of consciousness, and unconsciousness being a symptom of a profound dehydration.
I have also been portraying the saga of history as the story of Cain and Abel, Abel being the first of several incarnations of the son of God, including Isaac, Jesus, King David, King Arthur, Thomas Jefferson and Mohandas Gandhi, and Cain being the antichrist who incarnated as Ishmael and Mohammed, among others. I have named the true identity of Allah as being the mother of the Antichrist, Eve really, who also incarnates as the mother of Ishmael and Mohammed, equating her with Nurse Rachet, the evil shame-reinforcing Nurse from Ken Kesey's allegory of the psychedelic awakening that I am talking about, called One Flew over the Cookoo's Nest. I have equated Cain with Oedipus, with he and his mother caught in a terminal trap of shame laid by Satan, (Adam) the original advocate patriarchy and the incest taboo.
I have been saying that, much to the surprise of the world, the peace and love advocating, psilocybin eating, cannabis smoking, god loving, sexually liberated hippy shepherd Abel is about to become victorious over his fratricidal, empire-building, taboo and phobia reinforcing, god-resenting brother. I have defined Abel as being an advocate of matriarchy and Cain as being an advocate of patriarchy, and have defined the difference as pertaining to which parent lays down the law on the question of whether or not the mother of a boy can become the boy's lover, with Patriarchy giving this authority to the father, who says no, leading to disaster and the destruction of the world and Matriarchy leaving it with the mother, who says no problem, leading to an eternal kingdom of joy and happiness. I have described the living God who is Love as being pro-matriarchy, and the end-times really being about the triumph of matriarchy over patriarchy. I have made the point repeatedly that homophobia and the incest taboo are the hallmarks of a world in which men are afraid to love and that these taboos are the downfall of humanity.
I have been describing Heaven as tribal, orgiastic and pan sexual, the natural way of life for human beings who are not burdened by shame. I am basically saying, to paraphrase Bill Clinton, "It's the fig leaf, stupid!" Are you believers in the stories of the Bible, Jews and Christians alike, going to be ready to take off the fig leaf and begin to really live and love now? Or are you going to follow Cain all the way to his eternal abode in the antithesis of Abel's Heaven?
All I am trying to accomplish with this statement is providing a heads up. I am not trying to start any sort of group, movement, cult or religion at this time. I am only speaking about my experience for the benefit of anyone who might be interested in hearing about it. Thank you for taking the time to read my statement. Isaacsword.com
No comments:
Post a Comment