Saturday, April 02, 2005

Good and Evil (28)

Good and Evil

I offer the following definitions of good and evil as these pertain to human beings: A human being is good if he or she is willing to allow what is to be what it is. A human being is evil if he or she is unwilling to allow what is to be what it is. According to this definition, Adam, Eve and Cain were evil, and Abel was good, because he is the only one of the four willing to allow what is to be what it is. Abel, the paragon of goodness by virtue of his willingness to let the god be the god, returns as Isaac, Jesus and others, to a world ruled by his brother and nemesis, Cain, eventually claiming victory over his brother, who obstinately refused to back down from his position of refusing to allow his brother Abel to be what he wanted to be, namely, a lover of the Creator himself.

While I am at it, here are definitions that distinguish between gods and men: A god is a male human being who is not sexually repressed and therefore can have an infinite experience. A man is a male human being who is sexually repressed and therefore cannot have an infinite experience. Perfect Master is another, less loaded, name for a god, a man perfected in one particular way, he is perfectly good, having learned perfectly well how to allow what is already perfect to be what it is, all of which has a lot to do with not being sexually (life-energy) repressed. It is what Abel (Charlie) becomes at the end of his story.

"What is" as it pertains to these definitions is a god who is Good, who is Love, and who is Everything, and who wants to be known, loved and appreciated by all the men who live, thanks to His generosity, in the world that He conjured into existence and that He continues to conjure from moment to moment. It is a god who wants all men to become like gods themselves by becoming His lover, which is to say, to become unrepressed sexually. (There's plenty of this infinite love left for the women, don't worry.) A male human being (whether you call him a man, a god, or a demi-god) who is not repressed sexually is, by definition, a lover of god. If you are a man who claims to not be sexually repressed but also denies being a lover of god, then I say you don't have any idea what you are talking about. Your very own repression is the one and only cause of your very own ignorance of the purpose of your very own life, which is to be a lover of your very own Creator.

In the end, the perfect master insists that we know him because He knows it is better to be grateful for the generosity of others, particularly someone as generous as himself, than to be ungrateful; He knows that it's better for the person who is grateful, for the person to whom he or she is grateful, and for everyone else living in the same world with the grateful person and the person who gave him or her reason to be grateful. And because the appropriate expression of gratitude is important to overall happiness for everyone in a given realm of existence, it is required that people feel and express the appropriate gratitude for the real live person who is the Creator of the world in which they live, for starters. To be unwilling to Know what is, and therefore to allow what is to be what it is, when the opportunity clearly presents itself to Know what is (an event which has not yet occurred, but that will soon be occurring), is to choose to be evil according to this definition. In other words, to cling to Ignorance in the face of Truth would be a manifestation of what I am calling evil, because there is no place for ignorance and ingratitude in a world without evil and suffering.

"What is" is what is because it is the only thing that works in the long run. Every other idea of a universe inhabited by human beings, other than the idea that actually is the reality, will inevitably fail. Many such worlds may have already been tried and failed. The world that works is a world without ignorance, shame, fear, or negativity of any kind. The time for failures, as far as the Creator of this Universe is concerned, will soon be past. When it comes to suffering, war, injustice, destruction, and all of the other fruits of human ignorance and denial of reality, enough is enough. The insanity of this world will not continue much longer, because if allowed to continue it will ruin this planet as a place capable of sustaining human life. It's already past that point, really. The evidence of the damage done by the Cain-ruled human race is just lagging a few decades behind the actual doing of the damage.

If you, like Cain, would prefer to live in a universe that does not have a creator who wishes to be known, loved, and appreciated then I am afraid to say you came to the wrong universe made by the wrong creator. This attitude is exemplified in the Lord of the Rings trilogy by the orcs. Tolkein's story is an important allegory about the nature of reality and the saga of this world. The orcs represent the ungrateful people aligned with Cain who insist, to the bitter end, on denying the existence of the God who created this world. They are legion and, as portrayed in the story, they are inevitably destroyed because they must be destroyed in order for the good to survive. It's how the story goes, and this world is most certainly a story being told, the outcome of which is the triumph of the good (Abel) over the evil (Cain). If you are not willing to allow the God, who created and sustains the world that you have chosen to incarnate in, to be what He is (and He most certainly is a he) then you will fall into the category of evil, as far as the God is concerned. It is a Law that He Himself must obey: the God rewards the good and the evil are punished as a result of the audacity of their own choice to exist without intending to be good. Nobody has a right to exist who does not intend to be good, given that failing to be good will bring misery to others, as the good have been injured in this world. The fate of choosing to be other than good, and being condemned to Hell as a result, is a self-inflicted injury. Justice has its ways and they cannot be argued with. This is how what-is was constructed a very long time ago. No way around it. You can sit there and hate the truth forever in Cain's world, or you can learn to love the truth and enjoy a much better future in Abel's.

Please note that I am not saying that having proclaimed Jesus (or anyone else) as one's personal lord and savior has anything whatsoever to do with whether or not a person is good and therefore whether a person will be allowed into Heaven. Having made such a proclamation would be questionable in light of the prevailing ignorance of who the Christ was, or is, and what he really stands for. For example, most such people who have made this proclamation have done so while ignoring the clear indication in the Bible that to be with the Christ in Heaven is literally to be his lover in every sense of the word, along with everyone else. Christians who actively campaign against homosexuality cannot possibly understand the truth about the Christ, as they are clinging to a false concept of a homophobic Christ when, in reality, the Christ does not suffer in the least from the disease of homophobia. He has no taboos or phobias whatsoever, other than an aversion to people who deny the truth of who he and his family are, the family in which there are no rules that say things like "No, you cannot express your affection for the people you love the most, your mother, your father, your brother, your sister, in those ways."

The answer to the question of which Christians will actually want to be in Heaven is this: the ones who will come to like the idea that one of the first things that happens when Heaven is established is that the son of God makes love in the Temple with his mother, Mary, while his father and everyone else watches approvingly. I mean, lets just be logical about it for a moment: of course Mary will be in Heaven along with all of the other good people, right? And it says there right in the Bible that everyone in Heaven marries the Christ, so that would have to include the Christ's mother, right? And if they are married, then of course they are lovers right? And if they are lovers along with everyone else, then do you think they are going to pretend like they are not? No, they will get on with one of the most obviously significant expressions of Love of all, that between the Christ and his mother. (And if you think that Love doesn't get expressed in the dream world of the Love God, you are absolutely out to lunch.)

Thus patriarchy, homophobia, the incest taboo, the nuclear family, and therefore mortality itself, all of the hallmarks of Cain's world, are annihilated on day one of the Kingdom of Heaven. Heaven is Abel's world. And Abel is speaking to you, saying that everyone in my world loves everyone without paying heed to shame. If you don't like the sound of Abel's world then your Heaven will be with Cain and his friends in the place we Abel people call Hell. "Hey Cain, we haven't registered the trademark Heaven, so you are welcome to use that name on your door too, if you want!" "No problem! Anything I can do to help, just let me know! Just watch out for those lawyers, they may have a problem with truth in advertising after they find out what your place is really like." I really don't care if both sides call their respective worlds Heaven, I still think the ones I want will come to mine, and the ones Cain wants will come to his. So why should I care if he calls his hell, "Heaven?" He's pretty much of a liar, so it would seem logical he would go ahead with that idea.

Though human beings are mostly ignorant of the presence of God both within themselves and incarnate in this world, they will soon be made aware of His identity as a person living in this world and of techniques for experiencing His presence within. Anyone who is willing to experience the presence of the Love God within themselves will be putting themselves in allegiance with the God who is everything, who wishes to be known, and who rewards those who accept the reality of what is, who accept the will of the Creator who has invented the only possible success of a world. The only God who ever invented a world that worked is the very generous God who recognized that in order for human beings to be happy He must demand to be known and loved. Those who choose to be miserable will be left to their own fate and will not be allowed to ruin things for everyone else.

Prior to having comprehended the Knowledge of what is, a human being is good to the extent that he or she wishes or yearns to be good and to know and be known by a god who is also good. Those who have found in their hearts a sincere wish and intention to be good will accept the Truth of what is when it is revealed. Those who in their lives have not had a sincere wish and intention deep in their hearts to be good may have some difficulty in accepting the reality of God's existence and therefore in being good in the way that ultimately matters the most, namely, finding a sincere desire to know, love and appreciate the Creator who makes existence in a happy realm possible. Complete repentance of the evilness in a person's heart, along with a sense of being forgiven, are inherently required in order to overcome such a darkened heart as one that does not wish to be known intimately by the Creator of the world he lives in or to be a part of the only world that can work.

Homophobia, when it applies to an aversion to being a lover of the god and of the other men who love the god, which is just a plain and simple aversion to the whole idea of fulfilling the purpose of one's own existence, is really not a good excuse for refusing to experience the love that the Creator wants every man to experience, which is erotic in nature. Unfortunately, or so it would seem for some, it is impossible to separate the life force from he who bestows the life force. You can't have the gift, without recognizing the giver of the gift. I am talking about one gift that is both the gift of existence and the gift of happiness in existence. You can have the existence if you really want it, but you cannot have the happiness without recognizing the giver of the gift. To accept the gift without knowing the giver is to be ungrateful which ultimately will be the source of unhappiness. Homophobic men are unhappy because of their homophobia, not, as some would seem to suggest, because there are people in the world who are homosexual.

On earth, where men are ignorant of the love that sustains them, it is natural for men to have an aversion to the idea of being sexual with other men. Neither man has what it takes to be truly attractive to the other. In Heaven, where by definition men are conscious of the love of God that sustains them, it would be entirely unnatural for a man to have an aversion to the idea of men loving one another. In reality the unashamed men being together in the Temple is naturally more erotic for any man than the idea of being with one woman alone. The idea of one man and one woman alone as lovers completely loses its luster as the ultimate experience of love in the absence of shame. Marriages based on this sort of relationship is not a part of Heaven as described in the Bible because enlightened human beings have no interest in such a basically patriarchal arrangement that they now see as part of the problem of why a race of mortal human beings fails.

Another way of distinguishing between good and evil is this: A person who consciously strives to give more than they take from the collective treasury is good. A person who strives to take more from others than they give to others is evil. And using the laws of capitalism to justify one's own participation in injustice really doesn't cut it as an excuse. Capitalism is not the law of Abel or of God; it is the law of Cain. Givers are good and takers are evil. Nice simple definition. Up to this point in time, this is what matters most. People on the whole do seem willing to take advantage of every opportunity to take more than they give back. Just thought it might be worth noting the obvious. The idea that "Greed is good," is pure folly in my opinion. Cain, the empire-builder and spiritual leader of most of the men in this world (those sexually repressed men who strive to be like Cain and build empires of their own), is not in good stead with the Creator of this world. He has made himself an enemy of God. Men need to change their allegiances from Cain, the ungrateful empire-builder, to Abel, the child-like lover of God.

I believe that to come into existence as a human soul is to begin an existence that can never end. You are the one having the idea of yourself. You will never be able to cease existing as long as you continue to believe that you do exist. It's a bind you can never escape from. You do exist and will continue to forever. Each human soul who comes into being makes his or her choice regarding their intentions with respect to the sort of person they will be, whether good or evil. Nobody else has ever made this choice for anyone else, because it is a matter that is decided deep in one's own heart. It is a choice that each person makes entirely on his or her own behalf. There is no one to blame but oneself for the consequence of the decision not to at least yearn be good. There are people who have parents who are good, and yet who choose to be bad; and there are people with parents who are bad who choose to be good. The decision about whether to be good or bad was made a long time before the present incarnations of the people living in this world began. This is a completely individual choice. It is not about your family, your community, your tribe, your country, your race, your religion or belief systems, your station in life, the words you say, or even your past actions. It is about your present intentions.

You may have been thwarted in your ability to give; for example, you may have been wrongly put in prison for a so-called crime such as growing or distributing cannabis. Such a situation could severely limit your ability to give to others, but if you have had a sincere intention and a wish to be good, then you are good. And in this example, if you are in prison for growing cannabis, chances are pretty good that you do have an intention to be good, because you have taken major risks in order to provide people with something of real value. (It's funny how the experiment with prohibition of a truly harmful man-made drug, alcohol, that was undertaken in the 1920's is viewed by nearly everyone as a total failure, yet so few people challenge the prohibition of the beneficial and totally god-made plant cannabis! Obviously this inconsistency has to do with the fact that alcohol reinforces shame while cannabis exposes it.)

This Creation was conjured by a Creator who is Love and who is Good and who has a dream of a world in which human beings live together in happiness, peace and harmony. The lack of an intention to be good on the part of many human souls who have been incarnating in this world is the reason why this dream of God's has not yet been fulfilled. But the God does have a plan for fulfilling this dream and the plan is very near to its realization and it most certainly will be realized. Because the realization of the Creator's dream of Heaven is the most important part of what is. It's the reason anything exists at all. Judgment Day is the moment, coming in the year 2012, by when people will have made a decision about whether or not they are willing to allow what is to be what it is, that is, whether they are willing to be good. At that point in time, those who are willing to be good will be admitted into a realm reserved solely for those who are willing to be good, and those who are not willing to be good will be left to their own devices with one another in a realm inhabited solely by those, like themselves, lacking an intention to be good. Because I sincerely doubt that anyone qualified by their own intention to be good to live in Heaven will choose to exist in the realm inhabited by those who do not have such an intention. Or visa versa, for that matter.

The evil are thus condemned to the hell of their own making because the Almighty Creator's dream of a world of peace and happiness does get fulfilled, and this can only occur if those lacking in an intention to be good are separated from those who do have an intention to be good. The evil will eventually turn any world inhabited by both the good and the evil into Hell, so there might as well, for the sake of the good, be one realm for those who choose Hell, and another for those who do not. This is all a part of a very good plan, as far as I am concerned, given that nature really does abhor the vacuum of nothingness that would exist if nothing else did. In other words, inevitably something is going to exist, and what does actually exist is the only plan for an existence involving sentient beings that can be a success. Fighting against this truth is the purest form of folly that could ever exist. Any other plan turns into disaster, as exemplified by this world in which the idea of people living in ignorance of the Creator, under a patriarchal system with its requisite conditions of ignorance, mortality, homophobia, the nuclear family and the incest taboo, has been allowed to run its course. That's everyone's favorite ideas of how to live, based as they all are upon shame, and together they completely fail.

The leading proponent of the idea of Patriarchy is the person called Satan. Patriarchy as I describe it is the idea of a world that Satan somehow had the hubris to believe would work better than the Creator's idea, which is really a form of Matriarchy. As my favorite prophet, Terence McKenna, says, patriarchy is the result of men consuming alcohol instead of psychedelics as the intoxicant of choice. Men who consume alcohol become belligerent and competitive with one another and feel a need to own and control the women in order to preserve breeding rights, whereas men who consume psychedelics become loving with one another and allow the women to be free. Men who follow Cain and compete with one another, particularly with respect to breeding within a patriarchal nuclear-family-based system, who want to own and control women as if they were property, become enemies who end up warring with one another. Men in a matriarchal system become lovers with one another. Relaxed matriarchal systems are pansexual and orgiastic, and they succeed while uptight patriarchal systems fail. Do you think of alcohol as acceptable or good and psychedelics us unacceptable or bad? If you do, in my opinion you are a proponent of the failed idea of patriarchy and therefore an ally of Satan and an enemy of the leading advocate of a matriarchal system, the Almighty Creator of this world.

The Creator's plan is a plan that involves free will. Free will is an inevitable reality and there is no point questioning whether or not it should exist. You had free will to exist as a good or an evil person. If you don't like the consequence of having thus far not aspired to be good then please, for your own sake, turn your life around! The Creator does not wish to be a fascist. He does not wish to live forever in a world like this one in which the evil must be kept at bay. He doesn't want to spend the rest of eternity being a cop. He would much prefer to have a world inhabited solely by those who like himself, intend to be good, such that fascism, police, courts, lawyers, prisons, wars, weapons, etc. are entirely unnecessary. (It is amazing to think how much wasted human energy will be saved in a world in which everyone does intend to be good. 100% or more of the energy spent in this world will be saved. Human beings will be net producers instead of net users of aggregate energy.) It follows from what I am saying that to have chosen to exist as a human soul lacking a willingness to be good will turn out to have been a rather large mistake. If you are, in the end, unwilling to be good, if you have chosen to be evil, which, again, I define as being unwilling to allow the God who created what is to be the God that he is, you will be punished for being a parasite. Your soul will be captured and put into a prison with others such as yourself who have made a conscious decision to take while being unwilling to give. I would venture to speculate that this prison is, as often described, a rather unpleasant place to spend eternity. I highly recommend that you avoid the fate of those who are unwilling to allow what-is to be what it is.

If you do not sincerely believe, deep in your own heart, that you are a person who has strived to be good, then I urge you to begin a reformation process immediately. I suggest beginning this process by checking in with your local Roman Catholic pastor. The truth taught by the Catholic Church, in spite of its problems, is the actual truth that you need in order to overcome your lack of intention to be good. I believe a much more contemporary force than the traditional church is thought of as being, consisting of famous rock stars and actors among others numbering 144,000, will join with the church in assisting those who find it difficult to accept reality such as it is. Over on the fundamentalism side, I don't know what version of reality they will promote, but it will certainly be interesting to see. The evangelicals will split over whether this is truth or a great conspiracy. At this stage there is abundant evidence that this world is turning into a hellish desert simply because men choose to align themselves with Cain (ungrateful empire builder) instead of Abel (grateful lover of God), and any Cain people who are unwilling to mend their ways at this point in the game, when the error of their ways is so obviously harmful to the whole, deserve whatever fate they are choosing for themselves.

By the way, I just want to return to something I talked about in previous statements. Adolph Hitler looks to me a lot like a person pretending to be Cain, taking the measures and saying the things that Cain would have been taking and saying if he had been Hitler. Sort of going on the record here saying that I believe this is the probably the truth. I will go further and say that Napoleon and George W. Bush who, with Hitler, were the three incarnations of the person I used to call the Antichrist (before I realized Cain is the antichrist), were all highly likable and charismatic people, members of the ruling family, pretending to be like Cain would have been had he been in power himself. If George W. Bush himself were revealed to have been the reincarnation of Hitler and Napoleon, as I once believed he was, I would be more prepared to believe that he is on the side of good, pretending to be Cain, than that he is on the side of evil. If I am correct about Hitler being a member of the ruling family pretending to be Cain, I will have come up with the most amazing spontaneous revision of the most analyzed bits of history anyone in history, and I am not in the least bit qualified to call myself an historian by any stretch of the imagination, except in my ability to stretch the imagination. Everything I ever said about the struggle between "Satan" and "Lucifer" in history, I would now say was really a dramatization, put on by the incestuous ruling family, designed to mimic the struggle that would have existed between Adam/Satan and his son Cain/the antichrist, had the ruling family not intervened by taking power in order that there be a good outcome. Cain is represented by the conservative and more repressive faction of the empire (Bush), and Adam/Satan by the liberal faction of the empire (Kerry). Cain is the aggressor, Adam is the compassionate one.

No comments: